
A New York Times opinion piece this week argued the definition of death must be broadened in order to harvest more healthy organs from comatose patients.
Yes, really.
The piece explains one of two conditions must be met for doctors to harvest organs from donors: brain death or circulatory death.

Most organs come from brain-dead patients, since – despite lacking normal bodily functions – the heart can still pump blood throughout the body. However…
“Brain death is rare, though. In New York State, with a population of 20 million, there are on average fewer than 500 cases suitable for organ procurement and transplantation each year,” the piece notes.
The supply is not nearly enough to meet the demand.
That leaves circulatory death donors.
Currently, the Times writes, doctors wait up to five minutes after the heart stops pumping to declare a patient dead before harvesting organs. However, organs that have stopped being supplied blood aren’t exactly healthy organs for transplant patients.
Since organs being pumped blood are best for transplants, a procedure known as normothermic regional perfusion places patients dead from circulatory death on a machine that circulates blood throughout the body —which sometimes reanimates the heart.
This has led to moral and ethical concerns.
“How to resolve this debate? The solution, we believe, is to broaden the definition of brain death to include irreversibly comatose patients on life support,” the Times writes. “Using this definition, these patients would be legally dead regardless of whether a machine restored the beating of their heart.“
“So long as the patient had given informed consent for organ donation, removal would proceed without delay. The ethical debate about normothermic regional perfusion would be moot. And we would have more organs available for transplantation,” the piece continues.
The Times was slammed on social media for promoting the horrendous notion that expanding the definition of death is needed to keep the organ harvesting complex afloat.
“The technocratic managers will slowly but steadily enact every dystopian measure imaginable in order to squeeze every last bit of efficiency out of the system,” wrote Blaze editor Auron MacIntyre on X, adding, “Their power must be broken.”
One X user called attention to the ethnicity of the article’s authors, two of whom are of Indian descent.
“[N]ow Indian foreigners are proposing we should kill Americans and harvest their organs,” X user @ThomBrady5 replied in a quote repost of article author Sandeep Jauhaur. “These are the ‘best and the brightest’ getting published in the New York Times… we need 100 million mass deportations.”
Juahar appeared to have locked down his X replies after an influx of critical responses, with many commenting the piece had convinced them to opt out of being an organ donor.


The Times’ op-ed comes as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., announced last week his agency had found “hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life, and this is horrifying.”
“The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable,” RFK wrote in a statement. “The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor’s life is treated with the sanctity it deserves.”
Alex Jones discussed the macabre practice of hospitals murdering patients for their organs last week:
Support Infowars by picking up the new Ultra Methylene Blue CAPSULES or the popular Ultra Methylene Blue TINCTURE at TheAlexJonesStore.com.
You can support Jamie White’s family HERE.